The rules for reviewing articles submitted for publication in the Journal "Мелиорация"

All articles submitted to the Journal are peer reviewed. Reviewer is required to be scientist who is recognized as an expert over the subject of the reviewed materials, working in a particular scientific direction and has publications on the subject of the reviewed article within the last 3 years.
The reviewer cannot be the author or co-author and research supervisor of applicant of scientific degree as well as division staff in which author works. A reviewer of the article should be organized according to Reminder for the reviewer of scientific articles and materials in Journal "Мелиорация".
Manuscripts are not considered in the case of incorrect view excluding “Rules for authors”.
Editor informs the author about results of reviewing by providing a copy of review. Review contains recommendation for publication, corrective recommendation or reasoned refusal. Author may present new correct version of the article considering reviewer’s comments or denying them. Reviewer who gave critical remark re-evaluates already amended article. The Editorial Board consider the day of receipt the amended article as a receipt date. If the author disagrees with reviewer’s remarks he has a right to petition for repeat review or withdraw the article.
Editorial Board discusses all manuscripts and reviews at the meeting to accept or reject article. The editorial decision is made in the minutes of the meeting.
The order and sequence of article publication are considered according to the volume of published materials and rubric list in a particular Journal.
Editorial Board cannot guarantee the publication of all submitted materials. The article is not accepted to review if it is already published or submitted to other editions; information about authors according to “Rules for authors” is incomplete or absent at all. Editorial Board reserved the right to make changes without notifications.
Editorial Board makes final decision on expediency of publication. Manuscripts are not allowed to be published:
- if presented topic does not meet the scientific direction;
- if manuscript is incorrect or incomplete, author refuses to improve the article in fact;
- if the article is not improved as reviewer recommended.
Manuscripts and electronic medium of materials are not returned both published and inedited ones.
Reviews remains in editorial office of Journal for five years.